You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Light‐emitting diode phototherapy for unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia in neonates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007969.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Praveen Kumar, Deepak Chawla, Ashok Deorari |
| Abstract |
Phototherapy is the mainstay of treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia. The commonly used light sources for providing phototherapy are special blue fluorescent tubes, compact fluorescent tubes and halogen spotlights. However, light emitting diodes (LEDs) as light sources with high luminous intensity, narrow wavelength band and higher delivered irradiance could make phototherapy more efficacious than the conventional phototherapy units. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 21% |
| Unknown | 40 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,422,415
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,038
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,926
of 247,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.