↓ Skip to main content

Light‐emitting diode phototherapy for unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia in neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Light‐emitting diode phototherapy for unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia in neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007969.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Praveen Kumar, Deepak Chawla, Ashok Deorari

Abstract

Phototherapy is the mainstay of treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia. The commonly used light sources for providing phototherapy are special blue fluorescent tubes, compact fluorescent tubes and halogen spotlights. However, light emitting diodes (LEDs) as light sources with high luminous intensity, narrow wavelength band and higher delivered irradiance could make phototherapy more efficacious than the conventional phototherapy units.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 132 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Master 16 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Other 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 40 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,412,424
of 25,383,344 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,049
of 12,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,628
of 242,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,344 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.