You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The potential of an online educational platform to contribute to achieving sustainable development goals: a mixed-methods evaluation of the Peoples-uni online platform
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-018-0381-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sanjeev Sridharan, Madeleine Bondy, April Nakaima, Richard F. Heller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 13% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 44 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 47 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,802,547
of 24,145,400 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#407
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,673
of 348,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#23
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,145,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.