↓ Skip to main content

Spatial Guilds in the Serengeti Food Web Revealed by a Bayesian Group Model

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial Guilds in the Serengeti Food Web Revealed by a Bayesian Group Model
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002321
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward B. Baskerville, Andy P. Dobson, Trevor Bedford, Stefano Allesina, T. Michael Anderson, Mercedes Pascual

Abstract

Food webs, networks of feeding relationships in an ecosystem, provide fundamental insights into mechanisms that determine ecosystem stability and persistence. A standard approach in food-web analysis, and network analysis in general, has been to identify compartments, or modules, defined by many links within compartments and few links between them. This approach can identify large habitat boundaries in the network but may fail to identify other important structures. Empirical analyses of food webs have been further limited by low-resolution data for primary producers. In this paper, we present a Bayesian computational method for identifying group structure using a flexible definition that can describe both functional trophic roles and standard compartments. We apply this method to a newly compiled plant-mammal food web from the Serengeti ecosystem that includes high taxonomic resolution at the plant level, allowing a simultaneous examination of the signature of both habitat and trophic roles in network structure. We find that groups at the plant level reflect habitat structure, coupled at higher trophic levels by groups of herbivores, which are in turn coupled by carnivore groups. Thus the group structure of the Serengeti web represents a mixture of trophic guild structure and spatial pattern, in contrast to the standard compartments typically identified. The network topology supports recent ideas on spatial coupling and energy channels in ecosystems that have been proposed as important for persistence. Furthermore, our Bayesian approach provides a powerful, flexible framework for the study of network structure, and we believe it will prove instrumental in a variety of biological contexts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 5%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Réunion 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 201 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 27%
Researcher 40 18%
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Professor 12 5%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 27 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 43%
Environmental Science 52 23%
Computer Science 9 4%
Mathematics 8 4%
Physics and Astronomy 6 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 34 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2013.
All research outputs
#4,142,940
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,339
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,014
of 250,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#26
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.