↓ Skip to main content

Levels of selection in biofilms: multispecies biofilms are not evolutionary individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Levels of selection in biofilms: multispecies biofilms are not evolutionary individuals
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10539-016-9517-3
Authors

Ellen Clarke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Japan 1 2%
India 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 60 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 9%
Philosophy 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,123,906
of 24,278,128 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#172
of 702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,770
of 405,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,278,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them