You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early Mortality in Adults Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0028691 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amita Gupta, Girish Nadkarni, Wei-Teng Yang, Aditya Chandrasekhar, Nikhil Gupte, Gregory P. Bisson, Mina Hosseinipour, Naveen Gummadi |
| Abstract |
We systematically reviewed observational studies of early mortality post-antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) in Asia, Africa, and Central and South America, as defined by the World Bank, to summarize what is known. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 253 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 68 | 26% |
| Researcher | 46 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 113 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 58 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,921,492
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#24,708
of 193,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,860
of 243,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#272
of 2,948 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,948 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.