You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A candidate super-Earth planet orbiting near the snow line of Barnard’s star
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0677-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
I. Ribas, M. Tuomi, A. Reiners, R. P. Butler, J. C. Morales, M. Perger, S. Dreizler, C. Rodríguez-López, J. I. González Hernández, A. Rosich, F. Feng, T. Trifonov, S. S. Vogt, J. A. Caballero, A. Hatzes, E. Herrero, S. V. Jeffers, M. Lafarga, F. Murgas, R. P. Nelson, E. Rodríguez, J. B. P. Strachan, L. Tal-Or, J. Teske, B. Toledo-Padrón, M. Zechmeister, A. Quirrenbach, P. J. Amado, M. Azzaro, V. J. S. Béjar, J. R. Barnes, Z. M. Berdiñas, J. Burt, G. Coleman, M. Cortés-Contreras, J. Crane, S. G. Engle, E. F. Guinan, C. A. Haswell, Th. Henning, B. Holden, J. Jenkins, H. R. A. Jones, A. Kaminski, M. Kiraga, M. Kürster, M. H. Lee, M. J. López-González, D. Montes, J. Morin, A. Ofir, E. Pallé, R. Rebolo, S. Reffert, A. Schweitzer, W. Seifert, S. A. Shectman, D. Staab, R. A. Street, A. Suárez Mascareño, Y. Tsapras, S. X. Wang, G. Anglada-Escudé |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 759 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 151 | 20% |
| Spain | 46 | 6% |
| United States | 34 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 3% |
| Argentina | 9 | 1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| Finland | 5 | <1% |
| Mexico | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 54 | 7% |
| Unknown | 422 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 679 | 89% |
| Scientists | 68 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 32% |
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 56 | 58% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1401. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#9,130
of 25,847,449 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#939
of 98,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137
of 356,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#25
of 1,071 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,847,449 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,071 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.