↓ Skip to main content

Análise da preferência digital de idade no sistema de farmacovigilância do Brasil, 2008-2013

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Análise da preferência digital de idade no sistema de farmacovigilância do Brasil, 2008-2013
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, November 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-812320182311.21832016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Marques Mota, Álvaro Vigo, Ricardo de Souza Kuchenbecker

Abstract

The scope of this article is to analyze the digital preference for the "age" variable in the database of cases of adverse drug events reported between 2008 and 2013 in the pharmacovigilance system in Brazil. The database was analyzed in three stages: 1) Initial exploration; 2) standardization of variables; and 3) duplicate records management. The digital preference for the "age" variable according to sex and grouped regions of the country, was determined using the Whipple and Myers methods and also measured by the adhesion test based on statistical χ2 at 5% significance level. The female population was predominant (60.3%), with a female/male ratio of 1.5:1 and a female majority in 8 of the 12 age groups. Throughout the period under analysis, no preference for a terminal digit was observed in the "age" variable. The ages that were registered in the database appear not to reveal any imprecision and, therefore, this information cannot be interpreted as unreliable. These results point to a good performance in collecting data and information related to the "age" variable of the Brazil's pharmacovigilance system.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,314,471
of 21,431,229 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#881
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,405
of 281,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,431,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them