↓ Skip to main content

At What Stage of Neural Processing Does Cocaine Act to Boost Pursuit of Rewards?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
At What Stage of Neural Processing Does Cocaine Act to Boost Pursuit of Rewards?
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015081
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Hernandez, Yannick-André Breton, Kent Conover, Peter Shizgal

Abstract

Dopamine-containing neurons have been implicated in reward and decision making. One element of the supporting evidence is that cocaine, like other drugs that increase dopaminergic neurotransmission, powerfully potentiates reward seeking. We analyze this phenomenon from a novel perspective, introducing a new conceptual framework and new methodology for determining the stage(s) of neural processing at which drugs, lesions and physiological manipulations act to influence reward-seeking behavior. Cocaine strongly boosts the proclivity of rats to work for rewarding electrical brain stimulation. We show that the conventional conceptual framework and methods do not distinguish between three conflicting accounts of how the drug produces this effect: increased sensitivity of brain reward circuitry, increased gain, or decreased subjective reward costs. Sensitivity determines the stimulation strength required to produce a reward of a given intensity (a measure analogous to the KM of an enzyme) whereas gain determines the maximum intensity attainable (a measure analogous to the vmax of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction). To distinguish sensitivity changes from the other determinants, we measured and modeled reward seeking as a function of both stimulation strength and opportunity cost. The principal effect of cocaine was a two-fourfold increase in willingness to pay for the electrical reward, an effect consistent with increased gain or decreased subjective cost. This finding challenges the long-standing view that cocaine increases the sensitivity of brain reward circuitry. We discuss the implications of the results and the analytic approach for theories of how dopaminergic neurons and other diffuse modulatory brain systems contribute to reward pursuit, and we explore the implications of the conceptual framework for the study of natural rewards, drug reward, and mood.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 4%
United Kingdom 3 4%
Australia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 18%
Neuroscience 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2018.
All research outputs
#13,358,992
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#106,312
of 193,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,954
of 179,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#750
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.