↓ Skip to main content

Environments that Induce Synthetic Microbial Ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
294 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
538 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environments that Induce Synthetic Microbial Ecosystems
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niels Klitgord, Daniel Segrè

Abstract

Interactions between microbial species are sometimes mediated by the exchange of small molecules, secreted by one species and metabolized by another. Both one-way (commensal) and two-way (mutualistic) interactions may contribute to complex networks of interdependencies. Understanding these interactions constitutes an open challenge in microbial ecology, with applications ranging from the human microbiome to environmental sustainability. In parallel to natural communities, it is possible to explore interactions in artificial microbial ecosystems, e.g. pairs of genetically engineered mutualistic strains. Here we computationally generate artificial microbial ecosystems without re-engineering the microbes themselves, but rather by predicting their growth on appropriately designed media. We use genome-scale stoichiometric models of metabolism to identify media that can sustain growth for a pair of species, but fail to do so for one or both individual species, thereby inducing putative symbiotic interactions. We first tested our approach on two previously studied mutualistic pairs, and on a pair of highly curated model organisms, showing that our algorithms successfully recapitulate known interactions, robustly predict new ones, and provide novel insight on exchanged molecules. We then applied our method to all possible pairs of seven microbial species, and found that it is always possible to identify putative media that induce commensalism or mutualism. Our analysis also suggests that symbiotic interactions may arise more readily through environmental fluctuations than genetic modifications. We envision that our approach will help generate microbe-microbe interaction maps useful for understanding microbial consortia dynamics and evolution, and for exploring the full potential of natural metabolic pathways for metabolic engineering applications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 538 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 27 5%
France 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 11 2%
Unknown 483 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 152 28%
Researcher 127 24%
Student > Master 62 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 34 6%
Student > Bachelor 31 6%
Other 76 14%
Unknown 56 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 228 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 63 12%
Engineering 40 7%
Environmental Science 28 5%
Computer Science 19 4%
Other 79 15%
Unknown 81 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,538,708
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,080
of 9,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,021
of 191,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#24
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.