You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk Factor Analyses for Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in a Randomized Study of Early vs. Deferred ART during an Opportunistic Infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011416 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip M. Grant, Lauren Komarow, Janet Andersen, Irini Sereti, Savita Pahwa, Michael M. Lederman, Joseph Eron, Ian Sanne, William Powderly, Evelyn Hogg, Carol Suckow, Andrew Zolopa |
| Abstract |
Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) is reported widely in patients initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, few studies are prospective, and no study has evaluated the impact of the timing of ART when allocated randomly during an acute opportunistic infection (OI). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 25% |
| Unknown | 30 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,119,049
of 24,736,359 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#95,191
of 214,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,684
of 98,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#364
of 737 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,736,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 737 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.