You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Food‐web structure and ecosystem function in the Laurentian Great Lakes—Toward a conceptual model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Freshwater Biology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/fwb.13203 |
| Authors |
Jessica T. Ives, Bailey C. McMeans, Kevin S. McCann, Aaron T. Fisk, Timothy B. Johnson, David B. Bunnell, Kenneth T. Frank, Andrew M. Muir |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 29% |
| Finland | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 71% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 21% |
| Researcher | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 44 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 41 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,200,609
of 24,976,442 outputs
Outputs from Freshwater Biology
#761
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,280
of 349,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Freshwater Biology
#26
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,976,442 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.