You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Primary Cilia Are Not Required for Normal Canonical Wnt Signaling in the Mouse Embryo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0006839 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Polloneal Jymmiel R. Ocbina, Miquel Tuson, Kathryn V. Anderson |
| Abstract |
Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling in the mouse requires the microtubule-based organelle, the primary cilium. The primary cilium is assembled and maintained through the process of intraflagellar transport (IFT) and the response to Shh is blocked in mouse mutants that lack proteins required for IFT. Although the phenotypes of mouse IFT mutants do not overlap with phenotypes of known Wnt pathway mutants, recent studies report data suggesting that the primary cilium modulates responses to Wnt signals. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 31% |
| Researcher | 30 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2009.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,767
of 193,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,116
of 91,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#429
of 530 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 530 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.