You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Community Analysis of Chronic Wound Bacteria Using 16S rRNA Gene-Based Pyrosequencing: Impact of Diabetes and Antibiotics on Chronic Wound Microbiota
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0006462 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lance B. Price, Cindy M. Liu, Johan H. Melendez, Yelena M. Frankel, David Engelthaler, Maliha Aziz, Jolene Bowers, Rogan Rattray, Jacques Ravel, Chris Kingsley, Paul S. Keim, Gerald S. Lazarus, Jonathan M. Zenilman |
| Abstract |
Bacterial colonization is hypothesized to play a pathogenic role in the non-healing state of chronic wounds. We characterized wound bacteria from a cohort of chronic wound patients using a 16S rRNA gene-based pyrosequencing approach and assessed the impact of diabetes and antibiotics on chronic wound microbiota. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 66 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 20% |
| Unknown | 41 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 95 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 34 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2012.
All research outputs
#3,867,460
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#55,462
of 193,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,940
of 109,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#146
of 499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.