↓ Skip to main content

Insulin Stimulates Adipogenesis through the Akt-TSC2-mTORC1 Pathway

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
332 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insulin Stimulates Adipogenesis through the Akt-TSC2-mTORC1 Pathway
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui H. Zhang, Jingxiang Huang, Katrin Düvel, Bernard Boback, Shulin Wu, Rachel M. Squillace, Chin-Lee Wu, Brendan D. Manning

Abstract

The signaling pathways imposing hormonal control over adipocyte differentiation are poorly understood. While insulin and Akt signaling have been found previously to be essential for adipogenesis, the relative importance of their many downstream branches have not been defined. One direct substrate that is inhibited by Akt-mediated phosphorylation is the tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2) protein, which associates with TSC1 and acts as a critical negative regulator of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 1 (mTORC1). Loss of function of the TSC1-TSC2 complex results in constitutive mTORC1 signaling and, through mTORC1-dependent feedback mechanisms and loss of mTORC2 activity, leads to a concomitant block of Akt signaling to its other downstream targets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 279 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 25%
Researcher 52 18%
Student > Master 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 50 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 72 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 9%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 53 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,531,102
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#93,498
of 222,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,357
of 122,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#211
of 505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.