You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Integrating Clinical and Epidemiologic Data on Allergic Diseases Across Birth Cohorts: A Harmonization Study in the Mechanisms of the Development of Allergy Project
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Epidemiology, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1093/aje/kwy242 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marta Benet, Richard Albang, Mariona Pinart, Cynthia Hohmann, Christina G Tischer, Isabella Annesi-Maesano, Nour Baïz, Carsten Bindslev-Jensen, Karin C Lødrup Carlsen, Kai-Hakon Carlsen, Lourdes Cirugeda, Esben Eller, Maria Pia Fantini, Ulrike Gehring, Beatrix Gerhard, Davide Gori, Eva Hallner, Inger Kull, Jacopo Lenzi, Rosemary McEachan, Eleonora Minina, Isabelle Momas, Silvia Narduzzi, Emily S Petherick, Daniela Porta, Fanny Rancière, Marie Standl, Maties Torrent, Alet H Wijga, John Wright, Manolis Kogevinas, Stefano Guerra, Jordi Sunyer, Thomas Keil, Jean Bousquet, Dieter Maier, Josep M Anto, Judith Garcia-Aymerich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 60% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 15% |
Unspecified | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 20% |
Unspecified | 4 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,816,055
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Epidemiology
#2,544
of 9,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,289
of 365,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Epidemiology
#31
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.