↓ Skip to main content

Coping with Commitment: Projected Thermal Stress on Coral Reefs under Different Future Scenarios

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coping with Commitment: Projected Thermal Stress on Coral Reefs under Different Future Scenarios
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005712
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon D. Donner

Abstract

Periods of anomalously warm ocean temperatures can lead to mass coral bleaching. Past studies have concluded that anthropogenic climate change may rapidly increase the frequency of these thermal stress events, leading to declines in coral cover, shifts in the composition of corals and other reef-dwelling organisms, and stress on the human populations who depend on coral reef ecosystems for food, income and shoreline protection. The ability of greenhouse gas mitigation to alter the near-term forecast for coral reefs is limited by the time lag between greenhouse gas emissions and the physical climate response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 3%
Mexico 6 1%
Australia 5 1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Malaysia 3 <1%
Kenya 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 355 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 18%
Student > Master 50 12%
Student > Bachelor 48 12%
Other 27 7%
Other 74 18%
Unknown 44 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 146 36%
Environmental Science 111 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 36 9%
Social Sciences 10 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Other 35 9%
Unknown 56 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,214,808
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#26,907
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,598
of 130,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#78
of 521 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 521 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.