↓ Skip to main content

Implications of introgression for wildlife translocations: the case of North American martens

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implications of introgression for wildlife translocations: the case of North American martens
Published in
Conservation Genetics, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10592-018-1120-5
Authors

Jocelyn P. Colella, Robert E. Wilson, Sandra L. Talbot, Joseph A. Cook

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 67%
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 133%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#9,584,260
of 12,477,106 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#497
of 598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,022
of 274,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,477,106 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.