↓ Skip to main content

Utility and effectiveness of the Scandinavian guidelines to exclude computerized tomography scanning in mild traumatic brain injury - a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Emergency Medicine, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utility and effectiveness of the Scandinavian guidelines to exclude computerized tomography scanning in mild traumatic brain injury - a prospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12873-018-0193-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arurann Ananthaharan, Gunnhild Kravdal, Truls Martin Straume-Naesheim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 36%
Neuroscience 8 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 17 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,485,464
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#437
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,769
of 438,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.