You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Different tool training induces specific effects on body metric representation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experimental Brain Research, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00221-018-5405-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniele Romano, Elena Uberti, Pietro Caggiano, Gianna Cocchini, Angelo Maravita |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Canada | 2 | 15% |
| Italy | 2 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,469,353
of 24,652,720 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#260
of 3,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,425
of 447,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#5
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,652,720 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.