↓ Skip to main content

A representação cultural de um “parto natural”: o ordenamento do corpo grávido em meados do século XX

Overview of attention for article published in this source, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A representação cultural de um “parto natural”: o ordenamento do corpo grávido em meados do século XX
Published by
FapUNIFESP (SciELO), November 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-812320182311.27812016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilian Fernandes Arial Ayres, Bruno David Henriques, Wellington Mendonça de Amorim

Abstract

The scope of this study is to discuss teaching strategies directed towards women to institutionalize the representation of normal birth based on the work "Natural Childbirth: A Guide for Future Parents", published in 1955. The research begins with a historical and cultural analysis of the 1955, 1957, 1960 and 1964 editions of this book. It is aided by materials published, in the same period, which share the same meanings and representations concerning issues surrounding childbirth in the Brazilian context. It is a period marked by retrospectives and the emergence of methods for preparing women for the childbirth process. The results of our analysis, in the light of Roger Chartier's theoretical framework, especially applying the notion of representation of Michel Foucault, indicate that the apparatuses used in the work's registers sought to propose a disciplinary model for childbirth: institutionalization, medical insertion and industrialization of normal childbirth in the Brazilian context of the mid-twentieth century.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%