You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mortality of Patients Lost to Follow-Up in Antiretroviral Treatment Programmes in Resource-Limited Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0005790 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin W. G. Brinkhof, Mar Pujades-Rodriguez, Matthias Egger |
| Abstract |
The retention of patients in antiretroviral therapy (ART) programmes is an important issue in resource-limited settings. Loss to follow up can be substantial, but it is unclear what the outcomes are in patients who are lost to programmes. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 398 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 88 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 85 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 10% |
| Other | 28 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 74 | 18% |
| Unknown | 77 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 185 | 45% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 44 | 11% |
| Unknown | 98 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,462,513
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,197
of 219,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,646
of 121,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#86
of 515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.