↓ Skip to main content

Genetically encodable bioluminescent system from fungi

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetically encodable bioluminescent system from fungi
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1803615115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexey A. Kotlobay, Karen S. Sarkisyan, Yuliana A. Mokrushina, Marina Marcet-Houben, Ekaterina O. Serebrovskaya, Nadezhda M. Markina, Louisa Gonzalez Somermeyer, Andrey Y. Gorokhovatsky, Andrey Vvedensky, Konstantin V. Purtov, Valentin N. Petushkov, Natalja S. Rodionova, Tatiana V. Chepurnyh, Liliia I. Fakhranurova, Elena B. Guglya, Rustam Ziganshin, Aleksandra S. Tsarkova, Zinaida M. Kaskova, Victoria Shender, Maxim Abakumov, Tatiana O. Abakumova, Inna S. Povolotskaya, Fedor M. Eroshkin, Andrey G. Zaraisky, Alexander S. Mishin, Sergey V. Dolgov, Tatiana Y. Mitiouchkina, Eugene P. Kopantzev, Hans E. Waldenmaier, Anderson G. Oliveira, Yuichi Oba, Ekaterina Barsova, Ekaterina A. Bogdanova, Toni Gabaldón, Cassius V. Stevani, Sergey Lukyanov, Ivan V. Smirnov, Josef I. Gitelson, Fyodor A. Kondrashov, Ilia V. Yampolsky

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 442 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 246 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 22%
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 38 15%
Student > Master 24 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 49 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 21%
Chemistry 22 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 2%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 55 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 448. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#33,376
of 17,641,103 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#943
of 89,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,123
of 399,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#22
of 898 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,641,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 898 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.