↓ Skip to main content

Tumor-specific Th17-polarized cells eradicate large established melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
691 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
404 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tumor-specific Th17-polarized cells eradicate large established melanoma
Published in
Blood, March 2008
DOI 10.1182/blood-2007-11-120998
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pawel Muranski, Andrea Boni, Paul A. Antony, Lydie Cassard, Kari R. Irvine, Andrew Kaiser, Chrystal M. Paulos, Douglas C. Palmer, Christopher E. Touloukian, Krzysztof Ptak, Luca Gattinoni, Claudia Wrzesinski, Christian S. Hinrichs, Keith W. Kerstann, Lionel Feigenbaum, Chi-Chao Chan, Nicholas P. Restifo

Abstract

CD4+ T cells can differentiate into multiple effector subsets, but the potential roles of these subsets in anti-tumor immunity have not been fully explored. Seeking to study the impact of CD4+ T cell polarization on tumor rejection in a model mimicking human disease, we generated a new MHC class II-restricted, T-cell receptor (TCR) transgenic mouse model in which CD4+ T cells recognize a novel epitope in tyrosinase-related protein 1 (TRP-1), an antigen expressed by normal melanocytes and B16 murine melanoma. Cells could be robustly polarized into Th0, Th1, and Th17 subtypes in vitro, as evidenced by cytokine, chemokine, and adhesion molecule profiles and by surface markers, suggesting the potential for differential effector function in vivo. Contrary to the current view that Th1 cells are most important in tumor rejection, we found that Th17-polarized cells better mediated destruction of advanced B16 melanoma. Their therapeutic effect was critically dependent on interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) production, whereas depletion of interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-23 had little impact. Taken together, these data indicate that the appropriate in vitro polarization of effector CD4+ T cells is decisive for successful tumor eradication. This principle should be considered in designing clinical trials involving adoptive transfer-based immunotherapy of human malignancies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 390 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 105 26%
Researcher 73 18%
Student > Master 41 10%
Student > Bachelor 29 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 7%
Other 69 17%
Unknown 59 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 76 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 66 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 11%
Chemistry 4 <1%
Other 17 4%
Unknown 70 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,655,200
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#2,942
of 33,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,487
of 96,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#15
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.