↓ Skip to main content

Diversity in oat potential immunogenicity: basis for the selection of oat varieties with no toxicity in coeliac disease

Overview of attention for article published in Gut, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diversity in oat potential immunogenicity: basis for the selection of oat varieties with no toxicity in coeliac disease
Published in
Gut, February 2011
DOI 10.1136/gut.2010.225268
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. Comino, A. Real, L. de Lorenzo, H. Cornell, M. A. Lopez-Casado, F. Barro, P. Lorite, M. I. Torres, A. Cebolla, C. Sousa

Abstract

Coeliac disease (CD) is triggered by an abnormal reaction to gluten. Peptides resulting from partially digested gluten of wheat, barley or rye cause inflammation of the small intestinal mucosa. Previous contradictory studies suggest that oats may trigger the abnormal immunological response in patients with CD. Monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) against the main immunotoxic 33-mer peptide (A1 and G12) react strongly against wheat, barley and rye but have less reactivity against oats. The stated aim of this study is to test whether this observed reactivity could be related to the potential toxicity of oats for patients with CD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 1%
Paraguay 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 91 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 24%
Student > Bachelor 20 21%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 8 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#666,868
of 15,534,776 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#381
of 5,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,384
of 219,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,534,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.