You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of diaphragm training on lumbar stabilizer muscles: a new concept for improving segmental stability in the case of low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s181610 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Regina Finta, Edit Nagy, Tamás Bender |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Brazil | 1 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 264 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Researcher | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 103 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 69 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 113 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,476,220
of 26,038,372 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#578
of 2,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,161
of 366,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#30
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,038,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.