You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reduction in Learning Rates Associated with Anterograde Interference Results from Interactions between Different Timescales in Motor Adaptation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000893 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gary C. Sing, Maurice A. Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 25% |
| Researcher | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 27 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 12% |
| Psychology | 15 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,993
of 8,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,571
of 104,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#26
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.