↓ Skip to main content

Bacteria are not the primary cause of bleaching in the Mediterranean coral Oculina patagonica

Overview of attention for article published in The ISME Journal, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacteria are not the primary cause of bleaching in the Mediterranean coral Oculina patagonica
Published in
The ISME Journal, December 2007
DOI 10.1038/ismej.2007.88
Pubmed ID
Authors

T D Ainsworth, M Fine, G Roff, O Hoegh-Guldberg

Abstract

Coral bleaching occurs when the endosymbiosis between corals and their symbionts disintegrates during stress. Mass coral bleaching events have increased over the past 20 years and are directly correlated with periods of warm sea temperatures. However, some hypotheses have suggested that reef-building corals bleach due to infection by bacterial pathogens. The 'Bacterial Bleaching' hypothesis is based on laboratory studies of the Mediterranean invading coral, Oculina patagonica, and has further generated conclusions such as the coral probiotic hypothesis and coral hologenome theory of evolution. We aimed to investigate the natural microbial ecology of O. patagonica during the annual bleaching using fluorescence in situ hybridization to map bacterial populations within the coral tissue layers, and found that the coral bleaches on the temperate rocky reefs of the Israeli coastline without the presence of Vibrio shiloi or bacterial penetration of its tissue layers. Bacterial communities were found associated with the endolithic layer of bleached coral regions, and a community dominance shift from an apparent cyanobacterial-dominated endolithic layer to an algal-dominated layer was found in bleached coral samples. While bacterial communities certainly play important roles in coral stasis and health, we suggest environmental stressors, such as those documented with reef-building corals, are the primary triggers leading to bleaching of O. patagonica and suggest that bacterial involvement in patterns of bleaching is that of opportunistic colonization.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Mexico 3 1%
Belgium 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 207 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 17%
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Professor 14 6%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 27 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 143 60%
Environmental Science 32 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 30 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,814,498
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from The ISME Journal
#1,844
of 3,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,661
of 166,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The ISME Journal
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.