You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microbiota-driven interleukin-17-producing cells and eosinophils synergize to accelerate multiple myeloma progression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-07305-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arianna Calcinotto, Arianna Brevi, Marta Chesi, Roberto Ferrarese, Laura Garcia Perez, Matteo Grioni, Shaji Kumar, Victoria M. Garbitt, Meaghen E. Sharik, Kimberly J. Henderson, Giovanni Tonon, Michio Tomura, Yoshihiro Miwa, Enric Esplugues, Richard A. Flavell, Samuel Huber, Filippo Canducci, Vincent S. Rajkumar, P. Leif Bergsagel, Matteo Bellone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 44% |
| France | 3 | 9% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 53% |
| Scientists | 12 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 20 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#717,432
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#12,317
of 58,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,850
of 448,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#289
of 1,325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.