You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pumas as ecosystem engineers: ungulate carcasses support beetle assemblages in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-018-4315-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua M. Barry, L. Mark Elbroch, Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens, Ronald J. Sarno, Lisa Seelye, Anna Kusler, Howard B. Quigley, Melissa M. Grigione |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 45% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 87% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 34 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 50 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1464. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,400
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1
of 4,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132
of 448,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.