↓ Skip to main content

Seeing double in art and geoscience: 3D aerial portraits of ‘lost’ Anthropocene landscapes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Maps, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Seeing double in art and geoscience: 3D aerial portraits of ‘lost’ Anthropocene landscapes
Published in
Journal of Maps, November 2018
DOI 10.1080/17445647.2018.1534142
Authors

Simon A Mould

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,273,856
of 13,199,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Maps
#131
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,040
of 328,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Maps
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,199,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.