You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interior Ethnic Minority Boarding Schools: China’s Bold and Unpredictable Educational Experiment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Asian Studies Review, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1080/10357823.2018.1548572 |
Authors |
James Leibold |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 14% |
Australia | 5 | 10% |
Netherlands | 3 | 6% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | 2% |
Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 30 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 38 | 75% |
Scientists | 10 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 5 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 10 | 34% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,144,153
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies Review
#17
of 595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,568
of 447,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies Review
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.