You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution of Evolvability in Gene Regulatory Networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anton Crombach, Paulien Hogeweg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Denmark | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 446 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Poland | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 389 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 133 | 30% |
| Researcher | 106 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 7% |
| Professor | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 81 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 216 | 48% |
| Computer Science | 65 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 48 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 18 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 49 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,359,857
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,030
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,457
of 96,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#17
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.