↓ Skip to main content

Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011902.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Naomi Chuchu, Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Rubeta N Matin, David R Thomson, Kai Yuen Wong, Roger Benjamin Aldridge, Rachel Abbott, Monica Fawzy, Susan E Bayliss, Matthew J Grainge, Yemisi Takwoingi, Clare Davenport, Kathie Godfrey, Fiona M Walter, Hywel C Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Researcher 13 12%
Other 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Unspecified 5 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 24 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#358,178
of 14,021,570 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#956
of 10,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,459
of 368,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,021,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.