↓ Skip to main content

Using the candidacy framework to understand how doctor-patient interactions influence perceived eligibility to seek help for cancer alarm symptoms: a qualitative interview study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using the candidacy framework to understand how doctor-patient interactions influence perceived eligibility to seek help for cancer alarm symptoms: a qualitative interview study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12913-018-3730-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Tookey, Cristina Renzi, Jo Waller, Christian von Wagner, Katriina L. Whitaker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Psychology 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,132,950
of 25,380,089 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,840
of 8,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,102
of 449,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#70
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,089 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.