You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transmembrane but not soluble helices fold inside the ribosome tunnel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-07554-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuel Bañó-Polo, Carlos Baeza-Delgado, Silvia Tamborero, Anthony Hazel, Brayan Grau, IngMarie Nilsson, Paul Whitley, James C. Gumbart, Gunnar von Heijne, Ismael Mingarro |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 16% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 65% |
| Scientists | 8 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 23% |
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2021.
All research outputs
#816,645
of 23,865,786 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#13,613
of 49,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,705
of 440,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#384
of 1,333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,865,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.