↓ Skip to main content

Altered Effective Connectivity Network of the Amygdala in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Resting-State fMRI Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Altered Effective Connectivity Network of the Amygdala in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Resting-State fMRI Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015238
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Liao, Changjian Qiu, Claudio Gentili, Martin Walter, Zhengyong Pan, Jurong Ding, Wei Zhang, Qiyong Gong, Huafu Chen

Abstract

The amygdala is often found to be abnormally recruited in social anxiety disorder (SAD) patients. The question whether amygdala activation is primarily abnormal and affects other brain systems or whether it responds "normally" to an abnormal pattern of information conveyed by other brain structures remained unanswered. To address this question, we investigated a network of effective connectivity associated with the amygdala using Granger causality analysis on resting-state functional MRI data of 22 SAD patients and 21 healthy controls (HC). Implications of abnormal effective connectivity and clinical severity were investigated using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Decreased influence from inferior temporal gyrus (ITG) to amygdala was found in SAD, while bidirectional influences between amygdala and visual cortices were increased compared to HCs. Clinical relevance of decreased effective connectivity from ITG to amygdala was suggested by a negative correlation of LSAS avoidance scores and the value of Granger causality. Our study is the first to reveal a network of abnormal effective connectivity of core structures in SAD. This is in support of a disregulation in predescribed modules involved in affect control. The amygdala is placed in a central position of dysfunction characterized both by decreased regulatory influence of orbitofrontal cortex and increased crosstalk with visual cortex. The model which is proposed based on our results lends neurobiological support towards cognitive models considering disinhibition and an attentional bias towards negative stimuli as a core feature of the disorder.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 2%
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 295 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 24%
Researcher 48 15%
Student > Master 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 36 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 59 19%
Unknown 37 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 123 39%
Neuroscience 45 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 5%
Engineering 10 3%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 52 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,153,534
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#172,661
of 193,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,154
of 181,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,037
of 1,082 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,082 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.