↓ Skip to main content

Oral and intrauterine progestogens for atypical endometrial hyperplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral and intrauterine progestogens for atypical endometrial hyperplasia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009458.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Luo, Bing Luo, Ying Zheng, Heng Zhang, Jing Li, Neil Sidell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Materials Science 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 12 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,783,769
of 15,621,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,407
of 11,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,200
of 386,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,621,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.