You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Collagen-Based Mechanical Anisotropy of the Tectorial Membrane: Implications for Inter-Row Coupling of Outer Hair Cell Bundles
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2009
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004877 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Núria Gavara, Richard S. Chadwick |
Abstract |
The tectorial membrane (TM) in the mammalian cochlea displays anisotropy, where mechanical or structural properties differ along varying directions. The anisotropy arises from the presence of collagen fibrils organized in fibers of approximately 1 microm diameter that run radially across the TM. Mechanical coupling between the TM and the sensory epithelia is required for normal hearing. However, the lack of a suitable technique to measure mechanical anisotropy at the microscale level has hindered understanding of the TM's precise role. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 6% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 30% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 9 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2009.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,810
of 193,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,225
of 106,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#447
of 527 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 527 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.