You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013190 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Daniel Saleh, Naomi Chuchu, Susan E Bayliss, Lopa Patel, Clare Davenport, Yemisi Takwoingi, Kathie Godfrey, Rubeta N Matin, Rakesh Patalay, Hywel C Williams, Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 271 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 101 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 8% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 109 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,497,991
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,051
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,419
of 448,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.