You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Women in the English Historical Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
English Historical Review, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ehr/cey395 |
| Authors |
Rosemary Mitchell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 29% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 74% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 15% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,526,943
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from English Historical Review
#36
of 3,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,007
of 447,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from English Historical Review
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,067 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.