You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of the timing of administration of IgM- and IgA-enriched intravenous polyclonal immunoglobulins on the outcome of septic shock patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-018-0466-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giorgio Berlot, Michele Claudio Vassallo, Nicola Busetto, Margarita Nieto Yabar, Tatiana Istrati, Silvia Baronio, Giada Quarantotto, Mattia Bixio, Giulia Barbati, Roberto Dattola, Irene Longo, Antonino Chillemi, Alice Scamperle, Fulvio Iscra, Ariella Tomasini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 41% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,818,403
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#615
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,871
of 436,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#22
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.