↓ Skip to main content

The metabolic regimes of 356 rivers in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Data, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
60 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The metabolic regimes of 356 rivers in the United States
Published in
Scientific Data, December 2018
DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.292
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison P. Appling, Jordan S. Read, Luke A. Winslow, Maite Arroita, Emily S. Bernhardt, Natalie A. Griffiths, Robert O. Hall, Judson W. Harvey, James B. Heffernan, Emily H. Stanley, Edward G. Stets, Charles B. Yackulic

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 23%
Student > Master 20 19%
Other 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 40 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 24 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#783,323
of 19,049,821 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#297
of 1,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,221
of 406,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#59
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,049,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.