↓ Skip to main content

Variability and Action Mechanism of a Family of Anticomplement Proteins in Ixodes ricinus

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variability and Action Mechanism of a Family of Anticomplement Proteins in Ixodes ricinus
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001400
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard Couvreur, Jérôme Beaufays, Cédric Charon, Kathia Lahaye, François Gensale, Valérie Denis, Benoît Charloteaux, Yves Decrem, Pierre-Paul Prévôt, Michel Brossard, Luc Vanhamme, Edmond Godfroid

Abstract

Ticks are blood feeding arachnids that characteristically take a long blood meal. They must therefore counteract host defence mechanisms such as hemostasis, inflammation and the immune response. This is achieved by expressing batteries of salivary proteins coded by multigene families.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2008.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,810
of 193,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,991
of 155,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#182
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.