↓ Skip to main content

Is it time to start using the emoji in biomedical literature?

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1196 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
16 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is it time to start using the emoji in biomedical literature?
Published in
British Medical Journal, December 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmj.k5033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vikas N O’Reilly-Shah, Grant C Lynde, Craig S Jabaley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,196 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 22%
Student > Master 5 22%
Researcher 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 4 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 922. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,723
of 13,520,967 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#133
of 44,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279
of 343,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#10
of 697 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,520,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 697 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.