↓ Skip to main content

Impaired aortic distensibility and elevated central blood pressure in Turner Syndrome: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impaired aortic distensibility and elevated central blood pressure in Turner Syndrome: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12968-018-0497-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Wen, Christian Trolle, Mette H. Viuff, Steffen Ringgaard, Esben Laugesen, Ephraim J. Gutmark, Dhananjay Radhakrishnan Subramaniam, Philippe Backeljauw, Iris Gutmark-Little, Niels H. Andersen, Kristian H. Mortensen, Claus H. Gravholt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 21%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,757,283
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#483
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,738
of 444,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.