You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hyuk-Jae Chang, Fay Y Lin, Dan Gebow, Hae Young An, Daniele Andreini, Ravi Bathina, Andrea Baggiano, Virginia Beltrama, Rodrigo Cerci, Eui-Young Choi, Jung-Hyun Choi, So-Yeon Choi, Namsik Chung, Jason Cole, Joon-Hyung Doh, Sang-Jin Ha, Ae-Young Her, Cezary Kepka, Jang-Young Kim, Jin-Won Kim, Sang-Wook Kim, Woong Kim, Gianluca Pontone, Uma Valeti, Todd C Villines, Yao Lu, Amit Kumar, Iksung Cho, Ibrahim Danad, Donghee Han, Ran Heo, Sang-Eun Lee, Ji Hyun Lee, Hyung-Bok Park, Ji-Min Sung, David Leflang, Joseph Zullo, Leslee J Shaw, James K Min |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 192 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 78 | 41% |
United Kingdom | 15 | 8% |
Spain | 7 | 4% |
India | 4 | 2% |
Germany | 4 | 2% |
Mexico | 4 | 2% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
France | 2 | 1% |
Other | 23 | 12% |
Unknown | 49 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 106 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 21% |
Scientists | 40 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Unspecified | 10 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 33 | 23% |
Unknown | 56 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 33% |
Unspecified | 10 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
Engineering | 5 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Unknown | 63 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#233,877
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#29
of 2,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,798
of 447,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#2
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.