You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolutionary analysis of the Chikungunya virus epidemic in Mexico reveals intra-host mutational hotspots in the E1 protein
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0209292 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José Esteban Muñoz-Medina, Miguel Antonio Garcia-Knight, Alejandro Sanchez-Flores, Irma Eloísa Monroy-Muñoz, Ricardo Grande, Joakim Esbjörnsson, Clara Esperanza Santacruz-Tinoco, César Raúl González-Bonilla |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,027,561
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#126,400
of 197,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,602
of 436,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,004
of 3,122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.