↓ Skip to main content

Genetic data from nearly 63,000 women of European descent predicts DNA methylation biomarkers and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic data from nearly 63,000 women of European descent predicts DNA methylation biomarkers and epithelial ovarian cancer risk
Published in
Cancer Research, December 2018
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-2726
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yaohua Yang, Lang Wu, Xiang Shu, Yingchang Lu, Xiao-ou Shu, Qiuyin Cai, Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel, Bingshan Li, Fei Ye, Andrew Berchuck, Hoda Anton-Culver, Susana Banerjee, Javier Benitez, Line Bjørge, James D. Brenton, Ralf Butzow, Ian G. Campbell, Jenny Chang-Claude, Kexin Chen, Linda S. Cook, Daniel W. Cramer, Anna DeFazio, Joe Dennis, Jennifer A. Doherty, Thilo Dork, Diana M. Eccles, Digna Velez Edwards, Peter A. Fasching, Renée T Fortner, Simon A. Gayther, Graham G. Giles, Rosalind M Glasspool, Ellen L. Goode, Marc T. Goodman, Jacek Gronwald, Holly R Harris, Florian Heitz, Michelle A.T. Hildebrandt, Estrid Høgdall, Claus K. Høgdall, David G. Huntsman, Siddhartha P. Kar, Beth Y. Karlan, Linda E. Kelemen, Lambertus A Kiemeney, Susanne K. Kjaer, Anita Koushik, Diether Lambrechts, Nhu D Le, Douglas A Levine, Leon F.A.G. Massuger, Keitaro Matsuo, Taymaa May, Iain A. McNeish, Usha Menon, Francesmary Modugno, Alvaro N. Monteiro, Patricia G. Moorman, Kirsten B. Moysich, Roberta B. Ness, Heli Nevanlinna, Håkan Olsson, N. Charlotte Onland-Moret, Sue K. Park, James Paul, Celeste L. Pearce, Tanja Pejovic, Catherine M Phelan, Malcolm C. Pike, Susan J. Ramus, Elio Riboli, Cristina Rodríguez-Antona, Isabelle Romieu, Dale P. Sandler, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Veronica W. Setiawan, Kang Shan, Nadeem Siddiqui, Weiva Sieh, Meir J Stampfer, Rebecca Sutphen, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Lukasz Michal Szafron, Soo Hwang Teo, Shelley S. Tworoger, Jonathan P Tyrer, Penelope M. Webb, Nicolas Wentzensen, Emily White, Walter C. Willett, Alicja Wolk, Yin Ling Woo, Anna H. Wu, Li Yan, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Thomas A. Sellers, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Wei Zheng, Jirong Long

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 24%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 2 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,528,389
of 13,532,333 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#4,241
of 13,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,185
of 299,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#34
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,532,333 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.