↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for women with endometrioma prior to assisted reproductive technology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for women with endometrioma prior to assisted reproductive technology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008571.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Benschop, Cindy Farquhar, Nicolien van der Poel, Maas Jan Heineman

Abstract

Endometriomata are cysts of endometriosis in the ovaries. As artificial reproductive technology (ART) cycles involve oocyte pickup from the ovaries, endometriomata may interfere with the outcome of ART.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 203 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 14 7%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 63 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 72 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,358,697
of 25,391,066 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,007
of 12,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,524
of 109,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.