You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for women with endometrioma prior to assisted reproductive technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008571.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Benschop, Cindy Farquhar, Nicolien van der Poel, Maas Jan Heineman |
| Abstract |
Endometriomata are cysts of endometriosis in the ovaries. As artificial reproductive technology (ART) cycles involve oocyte pickup from the ovaries, endometriomata may interfere with the outcome of ART. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 213 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 22% |
| Unknown | 65 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 36% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 74 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,401,150
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,678
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,868
of 111,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.