↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for women with endometrioma prior to assisted reproductive technology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for women with endometrioma prior to assisted reproductive technology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008571.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Benschop, Cindy Farquhar, Nicolien van der Poel, Maas Jan Heineman

Abstract

Endometriomata are cysts of endometriosis in the ovaries. As artificial reproductive technology (ART) cycles involve oocyte pickup from the ovaries, endometriomata may interfere with the outcome of ART.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 2%
Ethiopia 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Researcher 14 14%
Unspecified 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Other 27 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 54%
Unspecified 21 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 10 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,113,728
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,291
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,329
of 217,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#259
of 449 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 449 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.