You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Animal movements in fire‐prone landscapes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/brv.12486 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dale G. Nimmo, Sarah Avitabile, Sam C. Banks, Rebecca Bliege Bird, Kate Callister, Michael F. Clarke, Chris R. Dickman, Tim S. Doherty, Don A. Driscoll, Aaron C. Greenville, Angie Haslem, Luke T. Kelly, Sally A. Kenny, José J. Lahoz‐Monfort, Connie Lee, Steven Leonard, Harry Moore, Thomas M. Newsome, Catherine L. Parr, Euan G. Ritchie, Kathryn Schneider, James M. Turner, Simon Watson, Martin Westbrooke, Mike Wouters, Matthew White, Andrew F. Bennett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 15 | 24% |
| United States | 6 | 10% |
| Spain | 5 | 8% |
| Colombia | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Iceland | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 57% |
| Scientists | 25 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 193 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 17% |
| Researcher | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 55 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 53 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 351. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#93,211
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#18
of 1,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,803
of 445,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.